Managed vs Unmanaged Environments in Power Platform
A key decision when building Power Platform Governance models is to decide how environments are structured and managed. Microsoft now provides managed environments as a way of introducing greater visibility across the platform.
Managed environments in Power Platforms not only give administrators greater oversight but also allow for greater control over how apps and flows are created amongst teams. This feature makes it particularly useful for organisations looking to scale Power Platform adoption while still maintaining control.
Unmanaged environments, however, offer greater flexibility for users and are often enjoyed in experimentation or early-stage development. But without the guardrails found in managed environments, they can create significant headaches for administrators.
Ultimately, it’s not really about picking one environment over the other. In reality, most organisations benefit from a combination of both and defining how each should be used is a key part of any Power Platform environment strategy.
Building a Power Platform Environment Strategy
A well-defined Power Platform environment strategy is vital for maintaining control as adoption grows. Organisations soon find themselves managing a large number of vague, purposeless environments without one.
An effective environment strategy usually includes a clear separation between development, testing, and production environments. Separating in this way ensures business-critical applications remain stable.
It should also define how environments are created and who has access to them post-launch. Power Platform tenant settings play a vital role here, giving organisations the ability to apply consistent rules around data usage and app creation across an entire platform.
Another consideration is environment routing, which determines where new apps and solutions should be built so as to avoid issues around duplication or solutions being made in the wrong environment. By guiding users towards the right structure, organisations can enjoy a degree of control without hindering innovation among teams.